↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004559.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lanhui Jiang, Linyu Deng, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Influenza is a communicable acute respiratory infection which, during epidemics, can cause high morbidity and mortality rates. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs, often administered following a particular Chinese medical theory, may be a potential treatment of choice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Other 19 11%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 43 24%
Unknown 27 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 34 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,268,448
of 22,173,707 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,855
of 12,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,876
of 176,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,173,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.