↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004559.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lanhui Jiang, Linyu Deng, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Influenza is a communicable acute respiratory infection which, during epidemics, can cause high morbidity and mortality rates. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs, often administered following a particular Chinese medical theory, may be a potential treatment of choice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Other 20 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Unspecified 7 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 54 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,066,982
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,674
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,569
of 211,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.