↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Chinese medicinal herbs for influenza
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004559.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lanhui Jiang, Linyu Deng, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Influenza is a communicable acute respiratory infection which, during epidemics, can cause high morbidity and mortality rates. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs, often administered following a particular Chinese medical theory, may be a potential treatment of choice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Other 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,590,570
of 17,781,901 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,916
of 11,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,538
of 165,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,781,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.