The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014513 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin J Konnyu, Sharlini Yogasingam, Johanie Lépine, Katrina Sullivan, Mostafa Alabousi, Alun Edwards, Michael Hillmer, Sathya Karunananthan, John N Lavis, Stefanie Linklater, Braden J Manns, David Moher, Sameh Mortazhejri, Samir Nazarali, P Alison Paprica, Timothy Ramsay, Paul MacDaragh Ryan, Peter Sargious, Kaveh G Shojania, Sharon E Straus, Marcello Tonelli, Andrea Tricco, Brigitte Vachon, Catherine Hy Yu, Michael Zahradnik, Thomas A Trikalinos, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Noah Ivers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 74 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,328,232
of 26,176,298 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,646
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,529
of 397,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.