↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin J Konnyu, Sharlini Yogasingam, Johanie Lépine, Katrina Sullivan, Mostafa Alabousi, Alun Edwards, Michael Hillmer, Sathya Karunananthan, John N Lavis, Stefanie Linklater, Braden J Manns, David Moher, Sameh Mortazhejri, Samir Nazarali, P Alison Paprica, Timothy Ramsay, Paul MacDaragh Ryan, Peter Sargious, Kaveh G Shojania, Sharon E Straus, Marcello Tonelli, Andrea Tricco, Brigitte Vachon, Catherine Hy Yu, Michael Zahradnik, Thomas A Trikalinos, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Noah Ivers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 27 28%
Other 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 27 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 39 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,403,488
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,003
of 11,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,378
of 378,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.