↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Different types of percutaneous endovascular interventions for acute ischemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014676.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuesong Bai, Xiao Zhang, Haozhi Gong, Tao Wang, Xue Wang, Wenjiao Wang, Kun Yang, Wuyang Yang, Yao Feng, Yan Ma, Bin Yang, Antonio Lopez-Rueda, Alejandro Tomasello, Vikram Jadhav, Liqun Jiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Unspecified 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Unspecified 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 22 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,904,024
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,465
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,154
of 399,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.