| Title |
Methadone at tapered doses for the management of opioid withdrawal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003409.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Amato, Marina Davoli, Silvia Minozzi, Eliana Ferroni, Robert Ali, Marica Ferri |
| Abstract |
The evidence of tapered methadone's efficacy in managing opioid withdrawal has been systematically evaluated in the previous version of this review that needs to be updated |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 68 | 21% |
| Unknown | 73 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 39% |
| Psychology | 35 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 82 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,121,724
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,359
of 13,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,942
of 198,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.