| Title |
Methadone at tapered doses for the management of opioid withdrawal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003409.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Amato, Marina Davoli, Silvia Minozzi, Eliana Ferroni, Robert Ali, Marica Ferri |
| Abstract |
The evidence of tapered methadone's efficacy in managing opioid withdrawal has been systematically evaluated in the previous version of this review that needs to be updated |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 328 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 20% |
| Unknown | 77 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 39% |
| Psychology | 35 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,096,261
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,221
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,738
of 205,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.