↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004197.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon C Langton Hewer, Sherie Smith, Nicola J Rowbotham, Alexander Yule, Alan R Smyth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,240,154
of 26,173,059 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,503
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,499
of 396,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,173,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.