↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008674.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nigel D'Souza, Geraldine Darmanin, Zbys Fedorowicz

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women and has a lifetime incidence of one in nine in the UK. Curative treatment requires surgery, and may involve adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy. In many women, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential to restore body image and improve quality of life. Timing of reconstruction may be immediately at the time of mastectomy or delayed until after surgery. Outcomes such as psychosocial morbidity, aesthetics and complications rates may differ between the two approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Student > Master 32 12%
Researcher 28 10%
Other 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 58 22%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 46%
Psychology 23 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 71 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,940,202
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,255
of 12,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,571
of 123,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.