The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002198.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M Ali K Motamedi, Nicole T Mak, Carl J Brown, Manoj J Raval, Ahmer A Karimuddin, Dean Giustini, Paul Terry Phang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 71% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 25 | 74% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,145,614
of 26,521,103 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,228
of 13,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,918
of 393,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,521,103 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.