The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Donepezil for vascular cognitive impairment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004395.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reem Malouf, Jacqueline Birks |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 302 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
Researcher | 37 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
Other | 24 | 8% |
Other | 65 | 21% |
Unknown | 87 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 9% |
Psychology | 25 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
Other | 47 | 15% |
Unknown | 100 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,512,064
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,154
of 13,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,345
of 148,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.