The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Utero‐placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008363.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Stampalija, Gillian ML Gyte, Zarko Alfirevic |
| Abstract |
Impaired placentation can cause some of the most important obstetrical complications such as pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction and has been linked to increased fetal morbidity and mortality. The failure to undergo physiological trophoblastic vascular changes is reflected by the high impedance to the blood flow at the level of the uterine arteries. Doppler ultrasound study of utero-placental blood vessels, using waveform indices or notching, may help to identify the 'at-risk' women in the first and second trimester of pregnancy, such that interventions might be used to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and/or mortality. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 267 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 21% |
| Unknown | 93 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 100 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,052,572
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,338
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,672
of 105,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.