The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Non‐Chinese herbal medicines for functional dyspepsia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013323.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Germán Báez, Camila Vargas, Marcelo Arancibia, Cristian Papuzinski, Juan Va Franco |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#648,140
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,117
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,457
of 388,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.