↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laser‐assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Laser‐assisted cataract surgery versus standard ultrasound phacoemulsification cataract surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010735.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akshay Narayan, Jennifer R Evans, David O'Brart, Catey Bunce, Daniel M Gore, Alexander C Day

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 9 13%
Unspecified 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Unspecified 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,387,393
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,848
of 11,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,984
of 367,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.