The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
First‐line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008161.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcia Reinhart, Lorri Puil, Douglas M Salzwedel, James M Wright |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Libya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 104 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 103 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 12% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#545,687
of 26,617,554 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#892
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,910
of 376,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.