↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for necrotising pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011383.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Ajay P Belgaumkar, Adam Haswell, Stephen P Pereira, Brian R Davidson

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 75 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Psychology 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 82 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,071,845
of 26,673,263 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,194
of 13,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,147
of 296,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,673,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.