The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Endovenous ablation for venous leg ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009494.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paris L Cai, Louise H Hitchman, Abduraheem H Mohamed, George E Smith, Ian Chetter, Daniel Carradice |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 36% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,361,034
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,724
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,672
of 368,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.