↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
341 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006095.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Z Goldenberg, Stephanie SY, Jane D Saxton, Mark R Martzen, Per O Vandvik, Kristian Thorlund, Gordon H Guyatt, Bradley C Johnston

Abstract

Antibiotics are widely prescribed; however they can cause disturbances in gastrointestinal flora which may lead to reduced resistance to pathogens such as Clostridium difficile (C. difficile). Probiotics are live organisms thought to balance the gastrointestinal flora.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 345 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 10%
Other 34 9%
Other 89 25%
Unknown 62 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 4%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 70 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 248. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#149,585
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#274
of 12,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#928
of 207,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.