| Title |
Surgical interventions for treating radial head fractures in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008987.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu Gao, Wei Zhang, Xin Duan, Jing Yang, Mohammed Al‐Qwbani, Jingtong Lv, Zhou Xiang |
| Abstract |
Radial head fractures are the most common type of elbow fracture and can severely affect the function of the elbow. There is uncertainty and controversy about when surgery is indicated as well as what type of surgical intervention is best. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,576,527
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,096
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,634
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#226
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.