↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-surgical therapies for Peyronie's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Non-surgical therapies for Peyronie's disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012206.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel E Rosenberg, Onuralp Ergun, Eu Chang Hwang, Michael C Risk, Jae Hung Jung, Mary E Edwards, Yooni Blair, Philipp Dahm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,701,336
of 24,224,854 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,984
of 12,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,384
of 215,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,224,854 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.