↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Breathing exercises for dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Breathing exercises for dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009041.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandy Jones, Alex Harvey, Louise Marston, Neil E O'Connell

Abstract

Dysfunctional breathing/hyperventilation syndrome (DB/HVS) is a respiratory disorder, psychologically or physiologically based, involving breathing too deeply and/or too rapidly (hyperventilation) or erratic breathing interspersed with breath-holding or sighing (DB). DB/HVS can result in significant patient morbidity and an array of symptoms including breathlessness, chest tightness, dizziness, tremor and paraesthesia. DB/HVS has an estimated prevalence of 9.5% in the general adult population, however, there is little consensus regarding the most effective management of this patient group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 21%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Researcher 17 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 88 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Psychology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 96 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,025,060
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,796
of 12,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,937
of 199,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.