The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Pharmacological interventions for clozapine-induced hypersalivation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005579.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Syed, Rebecca, Au, Katie, Cahill, Caroline, Duggan, Lorna, He, Yanling, Udu, Victor, Xia, Jun |
Abstract |
Clozapine is widely used for people with schizophrenia. Although agranulocytosis, weight gain, and cardiac problems are serious problems associated with its use, hypersalivation, sometimes of a gross and socially unacceptable quantity, is also common (30-80%). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 20% |
Chile | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 175 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Researcher | 19 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 18% |
Unknown | 55 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
Psychology | 12 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 55 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,219,680
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,822
of 12,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,982
of 82,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.