↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001301.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Cutting, Fabrizzio Horta, Vinh Dang, Minouche Me van Rumste, Ben Willem J Mol

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 31%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 14 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,608,224
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,264
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,402
of 362,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.