↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition of long‐acting beta2 agonists or long‐acting muscarinic antagonists versus doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma with medium…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Addition of long‐acting beta2 agonists or long‐acting muscarinic antagonists versus doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma with medium dose ICS: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013797.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Oba, Sumayya Anwer, Tarang Patel, Tinashe Maduke, Sofia Dias

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Unspecified 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 27 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Unspecified 4 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 28 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,557,850
of 26,798,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,565
of 13,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,619
of 368,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,798,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.