↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008844.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kasra Moazzami, Aria Roohi, Bobak Moazzami

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death in developed countries, and current treatment modalities have failed to regenerate the dead myocardium resulting from the ischemic damage. Stem cells have the potential to regenerate the damaged myocardium. These cells can be mobilized from the bone marrow by factors such as granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,287,990
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,717
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,715
of 208,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.