↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004874.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rakesh Lodha, Sushil K Kabra, Ravindra M Pandey

Abstract

Pneumonia caused by bacterial pathogens is the leading cause of mortality in children in low-income countries. Early administration of antibiotics improves outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 399 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 17%
Student > Bachelor 65 16%
Student > Postgraduate 44 11%
Researcher 36 9%
Other 27 7%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 93 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 109 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,169,463
of 22,579,714 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,700
of 12,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,350
of 176,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,579,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.