The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Antibiotics for community‐acquired pneumonia in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004874.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rakesh Lodha, Sushil K Kabra, Ravindra M Pandey |
| Abstract |
Pneumonia caused by bacterial pathogens is the leading cause of mortality in children in low-income countries. Early administration of antibiotics improves outcomes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| Mexico | 2 | 15% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 461 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 10% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 16% |
| Unknown | 141 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 179 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 10% |
| Unknown | 158 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,449,612
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,934
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,585
of 211,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.