RT @ZahcM: Available trial evidence of fiber on colorectal polyps and cancer (although limited): no benefits with some data even consistent…

@kinoshitayakuhi 大腸がん再発予防に 食物繊維(小麦ふすまの繊維、イスパキュラハスク、または高食物繊維の自然食品)も再発が増える可能性がある❗ https://t.co/ZmJwoUGKUg

11.https://t.co/CztaWY5QhL 12.https://t.co/T3nyMy1VO7 13.https://t.co/Xtb8yjglKG 14.https://t.co/DVQtsXcqKG 15.https://t.co/shr4yYCErE 16.https://t.co/wSEMiILUhJ 17.https://t.co/UjEHpBd98P 18.https://t.co/KzmN6Nvr16

@GeorgeAken Beste George: er zijn veel aanwijzingen voor een gunstig effect van voedingsvezel op de gezondheid. Zie bijv. https://t.co/HCpTGwP81v Maar helaas geen effect op darmkanker https://t.co/o459XncCS5 Rol van microbioom in dit alles is onduidelijk.

Avaliamos o efeito da ingestão de fibra alimentar versus placebo na recorrência de pólipos adenomatosos colorretais e na incidência de CRC em pessoas com história de pólipos adenomatosos. https://t.co/GJQDKbDXxS https://t.co/DKgPGFlNpm

@rosestant70 Go for gold standard Rosemary: “increasing fibre in a Western diet for 2 to 8 yrs did not lower the risk of bowel cancer. Paradoxically, after four years those receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared to control group

@SinAzucarOrg @calotonterias @NataliaLindu Si son tan buenos no hacen falta tantos años (ni tantas personas). Y si no pues no recomiendes basado en tus suposiciones. De todos modos las intervenciones nunca resultan muy favorables a los granos, por ejemplo

@dariopes @eldiarioes Numerosos artículos recientes prueban que la fibra tiene un efecto protector sobre este cáncer (https://t.co/RA2lJsRcv3, https://t.co/pXYUaCMH1N, https://t.co/ibCZvNsvFb). Es más, la fiabilidad del estudio sobre el riesgo de recurrenc

@dariopes @eldiarioes Numerosos artículos recientes prueban que la fibra tiene un efecto protector sobre este cáncer (https://t.co/RA2lJsRcv3, https://t.co/pXYUaCMH1N, https://t.co/ibCZvNsvFb). Es más, la fiabilidad del estudio sobre el riesgo de recurrenc

@NutritionMadeS3 Bullshit. It’s been a great but long week countering this redundant, unscientific and outdated rubbish. Stay in the dark ages if you want, but don’t try this rubbish on the public #lowcarb https://t.co/KLWbVbYHcD https://t.co/OVfox2Bq

@alfpre @ilicenamalek Lo señalé. Pero vamos, los revisores de la Cochrane son más honestos que los de DASH, que presumen de alta calidad de un FFQ, que todo el mundo sabe que es astrología glorificada. https://t.co/B8W4YYAt7O

@alfpre @ilicenamalek Ahora veamos qué dicen los RCT sobre ingesta fibra y riesgo de cáncer colorectal. Aquí Cochrane 2016: la evidencia no respalda q fibra reduzca riesgo (aunque revisores indican q los RCT son de baja calidad, lo q no permite dar mucha c

RT @ZahcM: Available trial evidence of fiber on colorectal polyps and cancer (although limited): no benefits with some data even consistent…

RT @ZahcM: Available trial evidence of fiber on colorectal polyps and cancer (although limited): no benefits with some data even consistent…

Available trial evidence of fiber on colorectal polyps and cancer (although limited): no benefits with some data even consistent with possible harm - https://t.co/fFogJH8lws https://t.co/g9KUkOCSzY

@Edw72737232 @DreamerLeaks @MJtheProphet @filipnilenius @TechnoSocialist @VaughnDarritt You mean this study where they say that the evidence quality was low and they have little confidence in their own findings? https://t.co/TzohZr68sm

RT @pownutrition: @rosestant70 And fibre&bowel cancer? “found that increasing fibre in Western diet for 2 to 8 yrs did not lower risk of bo…

@rosestant70 And fibre&bowel cancer? “found that increasing fibre in Western diet for 2 to 8 yrs did not lower risk of bowel cancer. Paradoxically, after 4 yrs these receiving fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared with the control group” @jwo

@HenryDimbleby @DrAseemMalhotra 🤔"This review found that increasing fibre in a Western diet for two to eight years did not lower the risk of bowel cancer. Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Comment please, @DietitianClaire . Fiber causes colon cancer? https://t.co/P56AHNaCr2

When you make a bad argument with a review that invalidates itself by stating “the quality of evidence was low” because small sample sizes and restricted trial duration.

@FoodFirst_Ty @CelticCarnivore @butsch_ramone @GeorgiaEdeMD 1) do you have a reference to that study? 2) based on this 👇🏼 study, would you advise people to stay away from fiber? https://t.co/3HhBCPEzpo

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Comment please, @DietitianClaire . Fiber causes colon cancer? https://t.co/P56AHNaCr2

Comment please, @DietitianClaire . Fiber causes colon cancer? https://t.co/P56AHNaCr2

@wcrfint @PaulaGoodyer Not doesn't Paula! Although it keeps you and the DAA cereal, bread sponsors happy? I'll stick with the real studies? https://t.co/OVfox2BqL6 @cochranecollab #lowcarb #lchf

@Eva3034385615 @JohnCaseIII @DiscoStew66 @WeDietitians @SoSBega @lowcarbdiabetic You ask a good question. https://t.co/eiBp5iEXUO "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared with the contr

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

@joderconleo te lo dedico: https://t.co/EirvH6DkJ8

@Chrest_brett @RChrisCC @AmandaZZ100 @LeighYaxley @matthk @MantasValenta @ajwodecki @MikeCarrato @shashiiyengar @tomchappell @bigfatsurprise @akmcintyre @drjkahn @DrOstfeld @osquiroga123 @ProfTimNoakes @stellaaa76 @DaveHPT @drjoesDIYhealth @rmuncy81 @Fruct

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: @TheAlanAragon Question: was this the Cochrane review of RCTs that they excluded? https://t.co/P56AHNsdiA

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

#Fiber 🤔 https://t.co/3uNONghTwH

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @KetoGeek: Oopsie Daisies... So much for that whole argument for fiber we were talking about. 😆 https://t.co/77olTP3PLr

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @KetoGeek: Oopsie Daisies... So much for that whole argument for fiber we were talking about. 😆 https://t.co/77olTP3PLr

RT @KetoGeek: Oopsie Daisies... So much for that whole argument for fiber we were talking about. 😆 https://t.co/77olTP3PLr

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

Oopsie Daisies... So much for that whole argument for fiber we were talking about. 😆 https://t.co/77olTP3PLr

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

So extra fibre in our diet is a waste of time and actually increases the risk of developing cancer? Who knew...? https://t.co/4yNGseJlOx

ProfTimNoakes: RT TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared with the control group, with the absolute increase in risk being one percent." … https://t.co/z5vOHY2WB

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

@TheAlanAragon https://t.co/CPUnnXZAMQ Whoops....

RT @TuckerGoodrich: Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared w…

@TheAlanAragon Question: was this the Cochrane review of RCTs that they excluded? https://t.co/P56AHNsdiA

Oops. "Paradoxically, after four years participants receiving dietary fibre had higher rates of bowel cancer compared with the control group, with the absolute increase in risk being one percent." https://t.co/VmTiVIAJDv

RT @gillespi: @DaveHPT Oh and here's the 2017 update of the 2002 Cochrane review on fibre and bowel cancer - yup also still no evidence htt…

RT @gillespi: @DaveHPT Oh and here's the 2017 update of the 2002 Cochrane review on fibre and bowel cancer - yup also still no evidence htt…

RT @gillespi: @DaveHPT Oh and here's the 2017 update of the 2002 Cochrane review on fibre and bowel cancer - yup also still no evidence htt…

RT @gillespi: @DaveHPT Oh and here's the 2017 update of the 2002 Cochrane review on fibre and bowel cancer - yup also still no evidence htt…

@DaveHPT Oh and here's the 2017 update of the 2002 Cochrane review on fibre and bowel cancer - yup also still no evidence https://t.co/CB7RKDYh6E

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

RT @EvidNutrition: #CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepi…

#CochraneUpdate Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorectales: https://t.co/4zJQHQvkes @seepidemiologia @semfyc

Does dietary fibre prevent the recurrence of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas? https://t.co/C91MpjnEmc

Czy wzrost spożycia błonnika pokarmowego może pomóc w zmniejszeniu ryzyka rozwoju raka jelita grubego?... https://t.co/D3z5CyoLdo

@FeliceJacka @DAA_feed Actual trials are negative for fibre and colon cancer https://t.co/V79N1L7wGu

Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. https://t.co/EZrI3kxQLl https://t.co/9U5zurTmbc

New NNT→Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. https://t.co/p3Mbyx2RkI

@LHerbioriste et je vois qu'une étude de 2002 https://t.co/UljZSGMTsK qui avait fait débat a été actualisée en 2017 https://t.co/n1YCEUGDHk, avec des

@Grant_Jenkins hence this Cochran review re polyps says "maybe, but not sure yet": https://t.co/C9AgZZRvw6

Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas https://t.co/dxWZIAd2PD https://t.co/3AVK0fA47b

RT @EvidNutrition: #RevSist #Cochrane ¿Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorrectales recurrentes?: https://t.co…

RT @EvidNutrition: #RevSist #Cochrane ¿Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorrectales recurrentes?: https://t.co…

RT @EvidNutrition: #RevSist #Cochrane ¿Fibra dietética para la prevención de adenomas y carcinomas colorrectales recurrentes?: https://t.co…

RT @serdna975: ¡Oh!, la hermosa hipótesis de un estudio epidemiológico https://t.co/AAWMajhM34 (v. @Midietacojea) ninguneada por la Ciencia…