↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Evaluation of follow‐up strategies for women with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of follow‐up strategies for women with epithelial ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006119.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georgia Zachou, Fatima El-Khouly, James Dilley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 9%
Researcher 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,390,694
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,116
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,159
of 359,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.