↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
70 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010971.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca A Abbott, Alice E Martin, Tamsin V Newlove-Delgado, Alison Bethel, Joanna Thompson-Coon, Rebecca Whear, Stuart Logan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 459 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 157 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 17%
Psychology 60 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 12%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 187 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#507,698
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#845
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,486
of 429,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.