↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
71 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
Title
Psychosocial interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010971.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca A Abbott, Alice E Martin, Tamsin V Newlove-Delgado, Alison Bethel, Joanna Thompson-Coon, Rebecca Whear, Stuart Logan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 441 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 144 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 17%
Psychology 59 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 13%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 172 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#490,709
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#830
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,329
of 426,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.