Title |
On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: effects on the professional practice of primary care providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000532.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elaine F Harkness, Peter J Bower |
Abstract |
Mental health problems are common in primary care and mental health workers (MHWs) are increasingly working in this setting delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients. In addition to treating patients directly, the introduction of on-site MHWs represents an organisational change that may lead to changes in the clinical behaviour of primary care providers (PCPs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 3 | 1% |
United States | 3 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 219 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
Researcher | 35 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 7% |
Other | 46 | 20% |
Unknown | 46 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 30% |
Psychology | 31 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 8% |
Unknown | 57 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,392,477
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,211
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,916
of 170,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.