↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: effects on the professional practice of primary care providers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: effects on the professional practice of primary care providers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000532.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine F Harkness, Peter J Bower

Abstract

Mental health problems are common in primary care and mental health workers (MHWs) are increasingly working in this setting delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients. In addition to treating patients directly, the introduction of on-site MHWs represents an organisational change that may lead to changes in the clinical behaviour of primary care providers (PCPs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
United States 3 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 189 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Other 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 24 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 32%
Psychology 32 16%
Social Sciences 24 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 34 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,864,452
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,355
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,834
of 164,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.