↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
83 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
983 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009874.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Hartley, Ewemade Igbinedion, Jennifer Holmes, Nadine Flowers, Margaret Thorogood, Aileen Clarke, Saverio Stranges, Lee Hooper, Karen Rees

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that high consumption of fruit and vegetables is beneficial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 983 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 968 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 157 16%
Student > Bachelor 156 16%
Researcher 98 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 5%
Other 168 17%
Unknown 267 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 251 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 134 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 7%
Social Sciences 37 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 3%
Other 156 16%
Unknown 307 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#403,286
of 26,332,460 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#661
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,705
of 212,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,332,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.