| Title |
Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009874.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Hartley, Ewemade Igbinedion, Jennifer Holmes, Nadine Flowers, Margaret Thorogood, Aileen Clarke, Saverio Stranges, Lee Hooper, Karen Rees |
| Abstract |
There is increasing evidence that high consumption of fruit and vegetables is beneficial for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 14% |
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| Colombia | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 975 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 960 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 156 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 153 | 16% |
| Researcher | 98 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 176 | 18% |
| Unknown | 258 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 248 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 136 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 160 | 16% |
| Unknown | 298 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#385,760
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#667
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,659
of 210,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.