↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in this source, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008970.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Coyne, Imelda, O'Mathúna, Dónal P, Gibson, Faith, Shields, Linda, Sheaf, Greg

Abstract

Children's rights to have their views heard in matters that affect their lives are now well established since the publication of the UN Convention treaty (1989). Children with cancer generally prefer to be involved in decision-making and consider it important that they have the opportunity to take part in decision-making concerning their health care, even in end-of-life decisions. There is considerable support for involving children in healthcare decision-making at a level commensurate with their experience, age and abilities. Thus healthcare professionals and parents need to know how they should involve children in decision-making and what interventions are most effective in promoting shared decision-making (SDM) for children with cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor 7 5%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Psychology 20 13%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 32 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#774,162
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from this source
#1,620
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,376
of 138,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#18
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.