↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
534 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008738.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leticia A Barajas-Nava, Jesús López-Alcalde, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Ivan Solà, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

Abstract

Infection of burn wounds is a serious problem because it can delay healing, increase scarring and invasive infection may result in the death of the patient. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of several interventions that may prevent burn wound infection and protect the burned patient from invasive infections.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 523 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 15%
Student > Bachelor 74 14%
Researcher 52 10%
Other 46 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 9%
Other 127 24%
Unknown 110 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 235 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Psychology 13 2%
Other 58 11%
Unknown 139 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,203,838
of 23,517,535 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,753
of 12,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,297
of 199,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,517,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.