↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
449 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008738.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leticia A Barajas-Nava, Jesús López-Alcalde, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Ivan Solà, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

Abstract

Infection of burn wounds is a serious problem because it can delay healing, increase scarring and invasive infection may result in the death of the patient. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of several interventions that may prevent burn wound infection and protect the burned patient from invasive infections.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 438 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 16%
Student > Bachelor 60 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 10%
Researcher 46 10%
Other 43 10%
Other 112 25%
Unknown 67 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 216 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Psychology 10 2%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 93 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#763,744
of 17,391,055 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,967
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,403
of 164,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,391,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.