↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008738.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leticia A Barajas‐Nava, Jesús López‐Alcalde, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Ivan Solà, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

Abstract

Infection of burn wounds is a serious problem because it can delay healing, increase scarring and invasive infection may result in the death of the patient. Antibiotic prophylaxis is one of several interventions that may prevent burn wound infection and protect the burned patient from invasive infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 569 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 14%
Student > Bachelor 75 13%
Researcher 56 10%
Other 50 9%
Student > Postgraduate 46 8%
Other 130 22%
Unknown 142 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 248 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Psychology 13 2%
Other 58 10%
Unknown 170 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,469,770
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,108
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,933
of 211,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.