The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Platinum‐based chemotherapy for early triple‐negative breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd014805.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sofia Re Mason, Melina L Willson, Sam J Egger, Jane Beith, Rachel F Dear, Annabel Goodwin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 66 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 40% |
| Scientists | 6 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#877,174
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,586
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,818
of 361,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.