Title |
Media campaigns for the prevention of illicit drug use in young people
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009287.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marica Ferri, Elias Allara, Alessandra Bo, Antonio Gasparrini, Fabrizio Faggiano |
Abstract |
Substance-specific mass media campaigns which address young people are widely used to prevent illicit drug use. They aim to reduce use and raise awareness of the problem. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 26% |
United States | 6 | 11% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 43 | 80% |
Scientists | 6 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 305 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
Researcher | 39 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
Other | 50 | 16% |
Unknown | 87 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 20% |
Psychology | 41 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 39 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 9% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 31 | 10% |
Unknown | 102 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#981,771
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,942
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,735
of 210,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.