The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Ready‐to‐use therapeutic food for home‐based treatment of severe acute malnutrition in children from six months to five years of age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009000.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anel Schoonees, Martani Lombard, Alfred Musekiwa, Etienne Nel, Jimmy Volmink |
| Abstract |
Malnourished children have a higher risk of death and illness. Treating severe acute malnourished children in hospitals is not always desirable or practical in rural settings, and home treatment may be better. Home treatment can be food prepared by the carer, such as flour porridge, or commercially manufactured food such as ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF). RUTF is made according to a standard, energy-rich composition defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). The benefits of RUTF include a low moisture content, long shelf life without needing refrigeration and that it requires no preparation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 382 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 21% |
| Researcher | 57 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 19% |
| Unknown | 82 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 10% |
| Unknown | 99 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,761,673
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,798
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,861
of 212,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.