↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Isoflavones for hypercholesterolaemia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Isoflavones for hypercholesterolaemia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009518.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Qin, Kai Niu, Yuan Zeng, Peng Liu, Long Yi, Ting Zhang, Qian Yong Zhang, Jun Dong Zhu, Man Tian Mi

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Isoflavones may be effective in improving hypercholesterolaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 181 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 47 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,297,597
of 21,346,872 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,811
of 12,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,264
of 175,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.