↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Isoflavones for hypercholesterolaemia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Isoflavones for hypercholesterolaemia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009518.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Qin, Kai Niu, Yuan Zeng, Peng Liu, Long Yi, Ting Zhang, Qian Yong Zhang, Jun Dong Zhu, Man Tian Mi

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Isoflavones may be effective in improving hypercholesterolaemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,622,206
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,173
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,518
of 210,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.