↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Isoflavones for hypercholesterolaemia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Isoflavones for hypercholesterolaemia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009518.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Qin, Kai Niu, Yuan Zeng, Peng Liu, Long Yi, Ting Zhang, Qian Yong Zhang, Jun Dong Zhu, Man Tian Mi

Abstract

Hypercholesterolaemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Isoflavones may be effective in improving hypercholesterolaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 33 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,298,324
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,917
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,976
of 164,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.