Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2023
Thomas D Lloyd, Louise J Geneen, Keeley Bernhardt, William McClune, Scott J Fernquest, Tamara Brown, Carolyn Dorée, Susan J Brunskill, Michael F Murphy, Antony JR Palmer
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||57%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||29%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||14%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 269,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.