↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicines for hypertriglyceridaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicines for hypertriglyceridaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009560.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao Lan Liu, George Q Li, Alan Bensoussan, Hosen Kiat, Kelvin Chan, Jian Ping Liu

Abstract

Hypertriglyceridaemia is associated with many diseases including atherosclerosis, diabetes, hypertension and chylomicronaemia. Chinese herbal medicines have been used for a long time as lipid-lowering agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 49 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 54 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,380
of 210,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#212
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.