↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home‐based support for disadvantaged teenage mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
Title
Home‐based support for disadvantaged teenage mothers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006723.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine Macdonald, Cathy Bennett, Jane A Dennis, Esther Coren, Jacoby Patterson, Margaret Astin, Joanne Abbott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 72 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 19%
Psychology 42 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 76 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2009.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,057
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,604
of 168,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.