↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006888.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia PA Nicolaï, Lotte M Kruidenier, Bianca LW Bendermacher, Martin H Prins, Rutger A Stokmans, Pieter PHL Broos, Joep AW Teijink

Abstract

People with intermittent claudication (IC) suffer from pain in the muscles of the leg occurring during exercise which is relieved by a short period of rest. Symptomatic relief can be achieved by (supervised) exercise therapy and pharmacological treatments. Ginkgo biloba is a vasoactive agent and is used to treat IC.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 37 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,257,981
of 22,590,459 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,921
of 12,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,124
of 176,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,590,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.