↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Ginkgo biloba for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006888.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia PA Nicolaï, Lotte M Kruidenier, Bianca LW Bendermacher, Martin H Prins, Rutger A Stokmans, Pieter PHL Broos, Joep AW Teijink

Abstract

People with intermittent claudication (IC) suffer from pain in the muscles of the leg occurring during exercise which is relieved by a short period of rest. Symptomatic relief can be achieved by (supervised) exercise therapy and pharmacological treatments. Ginkgo biloba is a vasoactive agent and is used to treat IC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 53 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,499,233
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,206
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,348
of 210,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.