↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009111.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Sohan Deshpande, Susan O'Meara, Katharine Speak

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 22 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,791,341
of 16,175,787 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,158
of 11,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,262
of 158,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,175,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.