↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
Title
Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009111.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo C Dumville, Sohan Deshpande, Susan O'Meara, Katharine Speak

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 257 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Unspecified 23 9%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 59 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Unspecified 23 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 64 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,264,397
of 23,517,535 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,172
of 12,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,844
of 199,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,517,535 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.