↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Caffeine versus other methylxanthines for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Caffeine versus other methylxanthines for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015462.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Moresco, Alice Sjögren, Keri A Marques, Roger Soll, Matteo Bruschettini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Librarian 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,287,160
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,678
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,143
of 361,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.