↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
44 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
A meta-ethnography of how children and young people with chronic non-cancer pain and their families experience and understand their condition, pain services, and treatments
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014873.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma France, Isabelle Uny, Ruth Turley, Katie Thomson, Jane Noyes, Abbie Jordan, Liz Forbat, Line Caes, Mayara Silveira Bianchim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 25 38%
Lecturer 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 24 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#874,239
of 25,263,619 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,703
of 13,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,061
of 347,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,263,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.