The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008165.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith A Cole, Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley, Mubarak Alqahtani, Heather E Barry, Cathal Cadogan, Audrey Rankin, Susan M Patterson, Ngaire Kerse, Chris R Cardwell, Cristin Ryan, Carmel Hughes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 27% |
| Unknown | 69 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 20 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,597,798
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,215
of 13,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,554
of 368,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.