↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Opioid antagonists for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Opioid antagonists for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003086.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean P David, Tim Lancaster, Lindsay F Stead, A. Eden Evins, Judith J Prochaska

Abstract

The reinforcing properties of nicotine may be mediated through release of various neurotransmitters both centrally and systemically. People who smoke report positive effects such as pleasure, arousal, and relaxation as well as relief of negative affect, tension, and anxiety. Opioid (narcotic) antagonists are of particular interest to investigators as potential agents to attenuate the rewarding effects of cigarette smoking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 36%
Psychology 29 16%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 46 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,558,186
of 21,069,566 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,657
of 12,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,680
of 174,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,069,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.