↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Opioid antagonists for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Opioid antagonists for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003086.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean P David, Tim Lancaster, Lindsay F Stead, A. Eden Evins, Judith J Prochaska

Abstract

The reinforcing properties of nicotine may be mediated through release of various neurotransmitters both centrally and systemically. People who smoke report positive effects such as pleasure, arousal, and relaxation as well as relief of negative affect, tension, and anxiety. Opioid (narcotic) antagonists are of particular interest to investigators as potential agents to attenuate the rewarding effects of cigarette smoking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 33%
Psychology 32 15%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 54 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,010,372
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,309
of 13,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,434
of 204,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.