The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Blood transfusion for preventing primary and secondary stroke in people with sickle cell disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003146.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lise J Estcourt, Patricia M Fortin, Sally Hopewell, Marialena Trivella, Winfred C Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Algeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 102 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#851,174
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,523
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,427
of 427,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.