| Title |
Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003260.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Bahar-Fuchs, Linda Clare, Bob Woods |
| Abstract |
Cognitive impairments, particularly memory problems, are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific interventional approaches designed to address difficulties with memory and other aspects of cognitive functioning. The present review is an update of previous versions of this review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 867 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 840 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 140 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 111 | 13% |
| Researcher | 96 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 6% |
| Other | 158 | 18% |
| Unknown | 197 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 184 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 156 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 68 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 4% |
| Other | 113 | 13% |
| Unknown | 222 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,823,497
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,062
of 12,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,354
of 201,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.