↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Home‐based versus centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2023
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007130.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinead Tj McDonagh, Hasnain Dalal, Sarah Moore, Christopher E Clark, Sarah G Dean, Kate Jolly, Aynsley Cowie, Jannat Afzal, Rod S Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 46 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 49 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,770,739
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,423
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,734
of 364,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.