↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Comparison of different regimens of proton pump inhibitors for acute peptic ulcer bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Comparison of different regimens of proton pump inhibitors for acute peptic ulcer bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007999.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Neumann, Luz M Letelier, Gabriel Rada, Juan Carlos Claro, Janet Martin, Colin W Howden, Yuhong Yuan, Grigorios I Leontiadis

Abstract

Treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) improves clinical outcomes in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. However, the optimal dose and route of administration of PPIs remains controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 23 11%
Other 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Other 53 25%
Unknown 52 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Psychology 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 58 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,722,792
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,319
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,030
of 209,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.