↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Beta‐blockers for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
104 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
693 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Beta‐blockers for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002003.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles S Wiysonge, Hazel A Bradley, Jimmy Volmink, Bongani M Mayosi, Lionel H Opie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 693 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 692 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 105 15%
Student > Master 91 13%
Researcher 49 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 109 16%
Unknown 258 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 196 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 45 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 86 12%
Unknown 277 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#461,528
of 26,322,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#767
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,572
of 426,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,322,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.