| Title |
Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007395.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raphael Freitas de Souza, Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos, Claudia H Lovato da Silva, Layla Abu‐Naba'a, Zbys Fedorowicz, Cem A Gurgan |
| Abstract |
Removing denture plaque may be essential for maintaining the oral health of edentulous people. Brushing and soaking in chemical products are two of the most commonly used methods of cleaning dentures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 259 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 22% |
| Unknown | 73 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 81 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,892,547
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,600
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,861
of 110,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.