↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003563.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meenu Singh, Nishant Jaiswal

Abstract

Humidity control measures in the home environment of patients with asthma have been recommended, since a warm humid environment favours the growth of house dust mites. However, there is no consensus about the usefulness of these measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 68 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Psychology 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 72 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,369,259
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,915
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,309
of 209,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.