↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Dehumidifiers for chronic asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003563.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meenu Singh, Nishant Jaiswal

Abstract

Humidity control measures in the home environment of patients with asthma have been recommended, since a warm humid environment favours the growth of house dust mites. However, there is no consensus about the usefulness of these measures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 65 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 70 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,109,317
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,508
of 12,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,530
of 198,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.